The recent State of Origin 2 served as a powerful reminder of a crucial reality in rugby league.
It's essential to recognize that having the top players doesn't guarantee a winning team.
Each year, the announcement of representative squads sparks a familiar cycle of debate.
When certain players are left out, fans express their outrage, former players join the conversation, and social media is flooded with accusations against selectors for their supposed errors.
Does this scenario sound familiar in the context of the recent selections? How about Haumole Olakau'atu?
The argument usually hinges on a player's talent, past performances, or established reputation justifying their selection.
However, the truth is far more complex.
Selection is not merely about recognizing individual talent or honoring past contributions.
It also doesn't involve repaying loyalty or considering what happened months prior.
And it is certainly not driven by media influence.
At its core, selection is focused solely on one objective: maximizing the chances of winning the next match.
As New South Wales braces for another insightful period of scrutiny after their disappointing loss in Melbourne, it might be prudent to reassess a lesson that the most successful teams and coaches have adhered to for many years.