Debate Grows Over Cleary's Suspension Validity

$800k masterstroke as Walsh debate over; ugly blame game not fooling anyone — Crawls

Nathan Cleary's recent controversial tackle on Hugo Savala has sparked a debate regarding consistency in disciplinary action within the league.

Critics calling for Cleary's suspension should recall Zac Hosking's tackle on Reece Walsh during the previous finals series, which resulted in a grade one charge and a fine.

Some argue that while Cleary is a premier player, that should not influence the decision on his incident.

Conversely, Josh Aloiai received a grade two charge and a one-match suspension for a tackle on Shaun Johnson earlier this year, raising questions about fairness.

Former player Braith Anasta has publicly stated, "I'm questioning whether it was a penalty myself," indicating mixed opinions within the commentary community.

The consensus seems to be that the context-whether a preliminary final or regular season-should not alter the severity of the punishment.

Ultimately, tackles like Cleary's should be judged independently of the player's status, reinforcing the need for standardized disciplinary measures across all incidents.

Menu
LeagueNews.co | Contact Us
All rights are owned by their respective owners
Terms & Conditions of Use