Super League's Confusing New Rules Leave Fans in Shadows

Warrington's Nu Brown and Hull FC's Ben Currie clash heads during their Super League match last month

LeagueNews.co | Cooper McEnroe

In the depths of winter, as rugby league lay dormant in the minds of most, a prominent figure within the sport shared a cautionary remark with me.

Despite the buzz surrounding the upcoming Super League campaign, they predicted that confusion and chaos would eventually prevail, as is the "rugby league way." Three weeks into the new season, those words hang heavily in the air.

The initial excitement generated by IMG's leadership has dissipated, replaced by an unhealthy amount of infighting among administrators, players, and supporters.

The beginning of what should have been a bright era for the sport has instead been overshadowed by utter confusion.

The impending legal case against the Rugby Football League, accusing them of negligence in protecting players from brain injuries, has loomed over rugby league for some time.

And now, with a slew of controversial rule amendments aimed at minimizing head contact, the sport finds itself in a complete mess.

Flashpoints have already emerged in the early rounds of the Super League, with Nu Brown's red card for an accidental head clash sparking controversy.

The subsequent admission by the RFL that their framework on head contact was too harsh only adds to the confusion.

Players, frustrated by a lack of consultation on these rule changes, have sought clarity from the RFL.

There have even been whispers of strikes, highlighting the discontent amongst the senior Super League players.

While a strike is unlikely, it serves as a warning to those in charge of the sport that the players' dissatisfaction cannot be ignored.

Menu
LeagueNews.co | Contact Us
All rights are owned by their respective owners
Terms & Conditions of Use